Editorial standards
How Grey Side Is Researched and Written
A warm voice does not excuse loose facts. This is how Grey Side turns a question into a page, decides which sources deserve weight, checks sensitive claims and keeps an educational assessment separate from psychological diagnosis.
Last reviewed:
You should be able to tell what a page knows, what it is interpreting and where it stops. This is how Grey Side researches content and uses one consistent editorial process across the human-readable page, its Markdown alternate and its short llms.txt description so those versions do not quietly disagree.
Every page starts with one clear job
Before a page is written, it gets one primary question to answer and a boundary around adjacent questions. A guide to what BDSM means should not pretend to be the India legal page; a page about healthy dominance should not swallow every question about relationships. That keeps the answer focused and helps you reach the right page instead of reading the same generic paragraph everywhere.
Research and sourcing
For factual claims, the strongest available source comes first: legislation and judgments for law, official public bodies for policy, original peer-reviewed research for research claims, and established clinical classifications when a page discusses diagnosis. Commentary and media can add context, but they do not outrank the underlying record. The full hierarchy is on the Sources page.
A citation is included only when it supports the sentence beside it. Association is not rewritten as causation, community language is not presented as a diagnosis, and a confident tone is never used to hide uncertainty. Personal experience is labelled by the way it is written; it is perspective, not a study sample.
Current law and sensitive claims
Indian legal material can change, so legal pages are checked against current primary text near publication or substantive revision. They carry a review date and link to the relevant official source. Grey Side explains general information in plain language; it does not give legal advice. Medical and psychological claims receive the same care with scope, uncertainty and source dates.
Writing, production and review
- The page is written for one adult reader in India, in direct and non-explicit language.
- Consent, revocability and the boundary against coercion are checked wherever power or risk appears.
- Titles, canonical URLs, structured data, internal links, sitemap entries and machine-readable alternates are generated or checked from the same typed page record.
- Automated checks catch broken links, duplicate query ownership, missing sources on research or legal pages, malformed heading structure and build failures.
- A substantive factual change moves the review date. A style-only adjustment does not pretend to be fresh research.
The assessment is educational, not diagnostic
The Dom/Sub/Switch assessment is a private self-reflection tool. It can show patterns in how you answered and give you language for further thought. It is not a validated psychological test, does not diagnose a personality or mental-health condition, does not certify readiness, and cannot tell you what role you must choose.
Its scoring rules, limitations and privacy model are explained separately in the assessment methodology. Your answers stay in your browser and disappear when you refresh or leave.